Friday, November 21, 2014

An attempt

The chest is full. Brimmed to the throat but the mouth cannot speak the words
unknown. Tongue is still lost
The brain is full. Brimmed to confusion though the answers are all in there
waiting. Traffic jam in the neurons
The eyes are full.

Ah! Eureka! painfully sweet

Thursday, November 6, 2014

Just when I really need it


God wants you to know that ...

even when you do something wrong, even when you fail, even when you make poor choices, you are loved.

God is not punitive. No doubt you will punish yourself enough for your mistakes. The question is: Will you try to do the right thing next time? Will you learn from your mistakes? Will you keep on loving and caring to the best of your ability?

Sunday, November 2, 2014

Sunday, October 26, 2014

Jesus' Commandment of Love

today's gospel is about the commandment of love. love God above all things. love your neighbor as you love yourself. what if you don't love yourself? what happens now?

let me repeat to myself, what Eve said in Only Lovers Left Alive

"How can you have lived for so long and still not get it?
This self-obsession is a waste of living.
It could be spent on surviving things, appreciating nature,
nurturing kindness and friendship, and dancing!
 

Wednesday, October 15, 2014

an excuse letter

Thursday, October 16, 2014


Dear Sir,

Please excuse me for being absent in our Saturday class (or today as you are reading it now). My family and I will be going to La Union early tomorrow morning as my paternal lolo is... dying. There is an ellipsis before the last word because I don’t know if that is the proper term. For 2 weeks now, he has been in the hospital. Weeks before that, he couldn’t pee and that caused his lower body to bloat, and parts of his skin to split. Still he did not want to be hospitalized because few weeks before that, too, he had just been admitted thereto and released therefrom. However, one day, my tita noticed his condition had worsen, and told him that she’ll bring him to the health center (to which he finally agreed) but had already secretly arranged for him to be admitted in the hospital which was still two or three towns away. Once there, he was cauterized (this might not be the word) and the fluids he released were almost three gallons. He had undergone dialysis, and was given antibiotics. Eventually, his legs shrunk. However, a day or two after that, he had diarrhea, and soon was excreting blood. His saliva also had blood. Endoscopy was made and it was discovered that he has ulcer. The internal wounds were cauterized, and he was forbidden to eat and drink, and was under observation. If he was to bleed again, the doctors will perform an operation on him. During such time, he became restless and might be a bit out of his mind, saying that he wanted to go home because he was not being fed not even being given a drink in such place. Sometimes he became violent and wild, especially at the time when my father asked for his leave to go home to Laguna, and that he’ll be back few days after. The following day, lolo again bled. Thus, he underwent operation. Fortunately, he survived it and the next critical 48 hours of recovery. 48 hours covered his 83rd birthday last Friday, October 10. Papa and Mama were already on their way to La Union, that Friday night. When they arrived in the hospital, my tita and tito told them that lolo had a cardiac arrest while he was undergoing dialysis just the night before. From then on and up to this day, he is in comatose at the ICU. He opens his eyes, stares at the ceiling, and moves his fingers, and everyone was hopeful although no one could talk to him anymore. That weekend, the doctors checked on him, a flashlight was directed on his eyes but they said there was no response. The brain suffered critical damage from the cardiac arrest, and that the sporadic opening of the eyelids and movement of the fingers were just involuntary. In short, what they were telling the family was that lolo is practically gone. Their advice was for the siblings to decide whether to be aggressive with the treatment which will lead to puncturing a hole on lolo’s throat that would likely cause pneumonia or let lolo be considering his age.

Just two weeks ago, I got a piece of wisdom from my boyfriend. He said that he believes that although God planned and knows everything, many of what happens in the world is the cause of our own will. God never and will never be the creator of a bad thing. Yet, since he created and planned us all, he already knew at the moment of our creation that the specific set of personality and physical attributes that we have will cause sin and we will make bad things because that is part of our own will. The consequences or reaction from the chain of actions and reactions can of course be changed by God. Such change is that which we know as divine intervention. Yet, divine intervention is rare. This piece of wisdom disturbed me. I’ve always believed that everything that has happened in my life is God’s will. The problems I had were given by Him to correct, strengthen, or guide me to His plan. If what has happened and what happens in my life are all my doing, and God only chooses at what rare moment to intervene, then that means that there are times when he doesn’t care about me, that no matter how much anyone prays, sometimes God doesn’t listen. It made me sad. After thinking about it some more, I understood and accepted it. We are at the mercy of God.

Papa and Mama went home last Sunday, and we were able to talk about lolo’s situation last Monday night when I got home from school. That day, my class was Civil Law Review II. I was overwhelmed with happiness when I topped the quiz that day in class as it was also the first time I had a passing score from all of the quizzes we had in said class. It was a miracle. It may just well be divine intervention. Then, at dinner, I finally had a somewhat clear picture of what was happening in La Union. To me, the implication of what the doctors had said is that it is as if lolo had already gone that time after he had a cardiac arrest. It seems that he went on just right after his birthday had ended. Thus, we planned to go home today or Friday, and stay in La Union until Thursday, and in between such days would be the wake and the funeral. It was numbing to think of the wake and funeral of someone whose condition I don’t exactly know where to place, at that time that we were talking about such. During the days that followed, I was in a state of delaying my grief until the day I am already in La Union, but at the same time, it was a state of making myself accept the situation and start letting go of lolo. Yet, then came Wednesday. I prepared the clothes I’ll be bringing to La Union. I was more careful in picking and planning what to bring not just for the reason of saving space but also because of the consciousness of the wake and the funeral that loom ahead. I was reminded of my lola’s wake and funeral five years ago. Mama bought a number of white shirts and blouses. I went to my 3-7PM class, and my mind would alternately focus on the discussion and drift off to what might be happening at that time in La Union. Is lolo already, officially gone? Lolo is probably already gone, and they were arranging matters for what’s next. After class, Papa sent me a message that the ventilator was removed 9AM and since then, lolo is okay.

“Okay” is indeed a big word. It made me glad, and then, confused, and then, both glad and confused. Just then, a good friend of mine asked me if I will be available on October 25. It made me feel bad to reply that I probably won’t be because I have an oral exam the following day, because I had not attended our recent get-togethers and I am again turning down an invitation. Then, she told me that a close friend of ours is getting married that day! I was of course very much surprised and happy! Turns out our friend broke the news last month online in a private message to us in a social network that I no longer log in to. I never thought that a person can feel opposite emotions at the same time, which do not cancel each other out but just sit side by side like two pigeons on a wire. Life is just... as it is - wonderful.

My apologies, Sir. I’ve wandered quite far. I forgot I was writing to you. I am actually writing this today, Wednesday, but post dated this letter to Thursday for reasons I don’t know or I’ve probably forgotten. We both know that just a little over a month, you also lost your older brother. You extensively talked to us about him, and your preparations, and the funeral. I knew it was sad for you, as I know how it feels to have a loveone die. Yet, it is only now that I understood how it feels like to know that someone is dying or going to die very soon and you wait, and prepare for that thing which you partly wish not to happen because you still sometimes hope, and partly wish to happen because you understand that it is how it is supposed to be, and so that you’d both be freed.

That last sentence in the preceding paragraph was what I actually want to tell you, sir. The request “please excuse me” is just how I thought of putting it as that is the customary way when a student is to absent himself from class. It goes the same for the next line.

Thank you for your kind consideration.



Sincerely,


Monday, October 6, 2014

150-peso dinner challenge

last sunday, charlton and i challenged ourselves to have a 150-peso limit for our dinner. partly because we were broke [but the hole in my pocket is bigger, i am sure (oh my, the words 'but' and 'hole' are separated by just one word)] and partly for the fun of it.

we got PotDog's fried siomai meal with medium red iced tea for 70PHP, one stick of crab eggs for 40PHP, two pancit canton (kalamansi, and sweet-spicy flavor) with four pandesals for 36PHP. all in all, our bill was 156 PHP!!! yehey! our tummies and hearts are full.

you had me at "special nerd in your life"

> _ <

the harry potter book ring box is cute but heartbreaking

engagement rings for nerds <3

Wednesday, September 17, 2014

little pleasures in life

- creamy coffee, a book, and adobo with malasado fried egg

- cream-o cookies/chocolate chip cookies with full cream milk

- going to the grocery with a loved one and preparing spaghetti without mama's help

- answering the exam on your favorite subject

- lechon kawali with mang tomas

- pinching your little sister's cheek and saying 'hmm mmm!'

- hershey's nuggets extra creamy milk chocolate with toffee and almonds. gott in himmel!! (and i just noticed i like creamy uh, things) it's so yummah!

Thursday, September 4, 2014

Bottled Water, and God-Forbid Bottled Air


It was just last night in our class with Atty. Brondial that we talked about the future of technology, and the impact of the latter to our laws, specifically the Rules on Evidence. He told us about this book from 1965 entitled “Futureshock” which he read when he was a bright-eyed college student (well, he still seems a bright-eyed student now, the ‘college’ part was the only thing that changed). In the book, the author foretold of ‘throw-away societies’, the Internet (although not in such term), and bottled water. Atty. Brondial said that during his time, they laughed at the thought of bottled water. Yet, there I was last night, with a bottled water atop my armchair. It made me shiver to remember that I had the same reaction to the concept of bottled air. I expressed a one-word prayer – Lord! – which God’s omnipotence translated into a proper statement that I hope it won’t happen and added that should it happen, please make it about decades and decades from now.

A bottled water is only our answer to the pollution of our waters. It was how we adapted to changes in our environment brought by our own doing whether by choice or happenstance. Adaptability is, as it was said in Zittrain’s lecture, the primary consideration in developing the Internet, which is in line with Darwin’s theory of adaptation. The useless has no place in the future. That is actually a comfort. At least, obsolete does not translate into useless. Zittrain acknowledges such thought when he kept on saying that the old might be brought back as the ‘new’ depending on the needs of the users/society. The proof of that is the cable box. At the time of Zittrain’s lecture, 2004, he said that cable boxes might be replaced by new technology or be brought back again. Now, in the year 2014, a decade later (!), the TV cable box is back (Hello Cignal and SkyCable!).

On the other side of the spectrum is ‘the useful’. Since we do away with the useless, what is left is the useful. However, the useful does not always mean the better nor the best. It is just useful. Again, it was just the answer to the current needs of this generation. Take again the TV cable box. It is indeed back, but who can say it is better than its predecessor? In my opinion, it was brought back to prevent tapping by unregistered users who are being ‘unjustly enriched’ at the expense of those who actually pay for cable subscription. However, as Benkler had proposed, and as Zittrain had reiterated, WiFi should be free for everyone. Those with WiFi should not put passwords on it. Why can’t this idea be the same for TV cable subscriptions, electricity or water lines? Hehe.. Is such a suggestion unethical or downright inane for a law student? This might be the application of the case of Laurel vs. Abrogar, People of the Phils., and PLDT. However, in said case, it was PLDT, the service provider, who was the complainant and being robbed. In the suggestion above, it is at the expense of both the service provider and the end-user that the ‘tapper’ is unjustly enriched.

In my opinion, the discussion on the preceding paragraph stems from the issue of control, which, many people may have noticed by now, is a recurring theme in the lectures in the iLaw Course. It is control that forces users to be protective and somewhat “lawfully selfish” of what they have. The thinking is “I paid for this, so it is only mine to use. If you want it, pay for it, too.” The Law actually sanctions that. It cannot be denied that control is a good thing as long as the control/regulation is a good law; this was already discussed in Lessig’s lecture. Yet, control may be the subject of abuse, not just from regulators but abuse by the end-users as well because in the Internet system, the end-users have gained control (as shown in the decentralization diagrams in both Benkler’s and Zittrain’s lectures).


Just recently, there is this news on the leak of the nude photos of many celebrities thru the iCloud. From this controversy, who is at fault? The hackers who illegally breached the system? Apple, who should have fortified its system in promising to provide quality service? Or is it the celebrities who could have acted vigilantly and responsibly? In Criminal Law, it is the hackers. Contract-wise, Apple might also be held liable. As to the celebrities, they cry out that it was an invasion of their privacy, and no one questions their act of taking pictures of themselves in the nude and posting it. It is because somehow, it has become the norm; it is only self-expression. Such is the perfect example of adaptation based on what is useful and not on what is better. It is the bottled water.

Here is the link :) 

Sunday, August 31, 2014

This week's message from God

Wisdom is knowing the difference between necessary and unnecessary pain. Pain is a part of our growing and learning process. To be a good person, there are 3 conditions: 1) deny yourself; 2) bear your cross; 3) follow God. (August 31 Gospel)

God does not make a mistake. There was no mistake on you. God loves you for who you are, no matter what you do. So just keep on living. (Mom's Night Out)

The meaning of life is living, appreciating nature, people, art, music... and dancing. especially dancing. (Only Lovers Left Alive)

Friday, August 29, 2014

bungi

it is that void left by your tooth for which i have devoted a certain spot
in my heart because your smile is now twice bright. each day
the number of candles left on the altar increases as disciples and pilgrims pay their respects.

never have they seen a smile that smiles.
have you?

sometimes i wonder if i could fill that void with my tongue, with your teeth on each side of the gap molding, framing it like samson between the two pillars but in this case, it is the tongue that yields and not the pillars. it is soft and

Friday, August 22, 2014

if i

if i could choose how to live, i'd choose the one in which i am always pressed up to you with the tiny tiny feathers on your neck tickling my pug-ly pug-ly nose
and then my world will always smell like cheezum and sweat and earwax and safeguard and i will be an elf

if i could choose how to die

Thursday, August 21, 2014

The Proverbial Balance Scale


The internet model of communication is simpler and more advantageous than that of the broadcast and of the telephone since the end-users are more in control and the system provides lesser limitations as to number of people who may communicate, and as to how they communicate. It is indeed a win-win situation. It is as if the only limits to communication are the personal circumstance (capacity to perceive and express, and the social influences to one’s being) and the choices of each person.
Benkler spoke of ‘control’ and the commercialization of information. In simpler words, he meant to say that the trend in the past 150 years was that information was only available to those who can afford it because communication is costly. However, a cheap form of communication, for example, broadcast (television and radio), is more susceptible to control. In one of my subjects in college, I came across the concept of “ideological state apparatuses”. Examples of these ISAs are the mass media, educational institutions, and religions. ISAs are the modes by which the powerful can influence and control people. The simpler and more accurate term for them would be “brainwashers”. As an example, take the GMA Network or ABS-CBN. Although we have different TV shows to choose from, we can only choose from those provided by the networks. Thus, there is already a limitation. Influence comes from watching what the networks present as, for example, the ‘real Filipino’ or the ‘real state of the Philippines’. It as if they tell us ‘this is how you should be’, ‘this is what you are’, ‘this is how they are’, and ‘this is how things are now’. Even the news, which are presented as impartial, unfeeling truths, had already been limited by the news writers, researchers, and cameramen.
In the video, Benkler discussed how the advent of the internet somehow changed the interplay between power and information. With the emergence of free software and peer-production, he said that the limit now is creativity and human wisdom. Everyone has the capacity to publish and have global reach. I beg to differ. Although influence and power of control has been extended to the middle class, there are still those who do not have access to the internet, and whose voices still have not been heard. Thus, commercialization of information is still present. Thus, when we talk of freedom and opportunities, it does not refer to all.
With all the freedom that we, the internet generation, have, what do we do with it? It makes me wonder sometimes: if communication has now been made easy because every person is just one text/instant/video message away, how come people are still lonely, misunderstood, and some even are sociopaths? The percentage of suicides and suicide attempts are higher in countries with the more advanced technology. Crimes, ranging from bullying to online store scams to pornography to terrorism, are easier to perpetrate thru the technology now available. Is this what we choose when we are free and almost limitless? Shouldn’t it be that the more civilized society is, the more understanding the minds of every person are?

Here is the video :)

Man vs. Machine vs. Man


It is ironic that I do not consider myself a fan of the internet and yet I make use of its ‘services’. I say that I am not a fan because if there would be no constraints as to time, resources, etc., I would prefer talking to someone tete-a-tete, writing and reading in paper, receiving letters, drawing with paint, and the many physical counterparts of things that cyberspace had simplified. I have assumptions on why people crave disclosing the tiny details of their tiny (in parity to the world wide web) lives in the internet, that I would rather not say here because I am sure we all have are own opinion about it. It is also ironic that I am not a fan when I was already acquainted with a computer as early as the 2nd grade and such was a time when not all schools offer computer subjects in their curriculum. The internet for me is only a helpful tool, and we can still function without it. This view is partly based on the idea that we human beings should not be slaves of technology and human interaction is best done in the flesh, not through packet switching, and partly based on my distrust of the internet system as a whole.

How can one not distrust the internet when these are happening nowadays?

  • News from the CNN that some hackers have in their possession 1.2 billion usernames and passwords
  • As if one internet is not enough? Clearly, the influence of the internet in people’s live will grow even more up to a point that we won’t be able to function without it.
  • This concept of the internet of things gave me a chilling effect. What else could this mean if not the sense that humans are now likened and used as computers?
Upon watching the video, I gained new insights. I realized that the internet is neutral and it is actually the person (his preferences, needs, and use of the internet) that shapes his outlook of the system. The internet is nothing but a set of codes that are changeable to fit the needs of people. Humans, not machines, will still rule.
My second realization is that a good law will not have bad consequences. People’s disagreement and contentions on forms of regulation are brought about by their distrust to the government that rules over them. This might not be the case in a world where citizens are secured that their rights and freedoms will not be abused by those in power. It is true that the enjoyment of a right may sometime entail a sacrifice of a bit of our freedom, as embodied under Article 19 of the New Civil Code. When we vote the leaders who will represent us, such freedom of choice is accompanied by the capitulation of our control over some aspects of society and though indirectly, of ourselves. That is why I agree with Lawrence Lessig when he said that legislators must understand the relationship of the modes of regulations with behavior. What he is implying is that we must choose our leaders well and pray that they realize the responsibility and the authority conferred by their office. Still, the flaw lies on humans. We all come from different backgrounds which shaped our system of beliefs. One person’s priority may not be another’s. The same applies to our legislators. The only hope I see is the eradication of the concept of “is-ism”. Nothing is constant.

Here is the video :)

Wednesday, July 30, 2014

the sound of the airconditioner in your room is a slight drizzle falling on rooftops and leaving clinging droplets on bright, blithe umbrellas.
the room has gone yet the drizzle is here tap tap tapping on a faded tent
outside, can't help myself from a smile escaping and my eyes closing
on that bed where i used to lay listening to the sound, breathing in scents of laundered sheets, shirt and ssh hmm mmm